CRIME:
The members of the Wildlife Agency unquestionably crossed ethical boundaries by accepting gifts and favors from the hotel company seeking approval to build in the national park. Their decision to vote in favor of the hotel project, despite the evident conflict of interest, resulted in the extinction of the critically endangered ASTRAMITE insect. By prioritizing personal benefits over their duty to protect the park’s flora and fauna, the Wildlife Agency members engaged in actions that can be deemed unethical and harmful to the environment. This deliberate compromise of their responsibilities qualifies as a “CRIME” against conservation and ethical governance.

NO CRIME:
The members of the Wildlife Agency may argue that their decision to approve the hotel project was based on a comprehensive assessment of the situation, taking into account both environmental concerns and potential economic benefits. While they received gifts from the hotel company, the members might contend that these did not unduly influence their professional judgment. In their view, the economic opportunities presented by the hotel,